UKRI
Public Engagement Spark Awards 2026B
The questions, word limits and assessment criteria below are the funder’s own, taken from the published competition material. You still submit through their service; this is where the writing happens first.
14 questions, straight from the funder
Their word limits are on every box, counted live as you type, and what the assessor is told to look for sits beside it. All of that is free. The pre-sift check — every mechanical rule that rejects a proposal before anyone reads it, run over what you have written — comes with the pass.
Application questions
Q1 Summary
0 / 550 wordsIn plain English, provide a summary we can use to identify the most suitable experts to assess your application. We usually make this summary publicly available on external-facing websites, therefore do not include any confidential or sensitive information. Make it suitable for a variety of readers, for example: opinion-formers policymakers the public the wider research community
Q2 Vision
0 / 500 wordsWhat are you hoping to achieve with your proposed work?
What the assessor looks for
- is of high quality and importance within or beyond the field(s) or area(s)
- equitably engages with public groups and audiences
- is timely given current trends, context and needs
- promotes wider advocacy, leadership, promotion and championing of public engagement
A filled dot only means your answer mentions that ground. It is not a judgement of how well.
Q3 Approach
0 / 850 wordsHow are you going to deliver your proposed work?
What the assessor looks for
- clearly describes the different engagement, networking or capacity building activities planned as part of the project
- clearly identifies target audiences
- provides clear evidence of audience demand for the project
- demonstrates the appropriateness of the methodology proposed to reach and appeal to the intended audiences
- demonstrates and builds upon learning from previous activities and wider sector good practice
- is effective and appropriate to achieve your objectives
- is feasible, and comprehensively identifies any risks to delivery and how they will be managed
- embeds equality, diversity, and inclusion (EDI)
A filled dot only means your answer mentions that ground. It is not a judgement of how well.
Q4 Applicant and team capability to deliver
0 / 750 wordsWhy are you the right individual or team to successfully deliver the proposed work?
What the assessor looks for
- the relevant experience to deliver the proposed work
- the right balance of skills and expertise to cover the proposed work including, where relevant, lived experience
- the appropriate leadership and management skills to deliver the work and your approach to develop others
- contributed to developing a positive working environment and wider community and appropriate safeguarding measures when working with people with lived experience
A filled dot only means your answer mentions that ground. It is not a judgement of how well.
Q5 Resources and costs
0 / 500 wordsWhat will you need to deliver your proposed work and how much will it cost?
What the assessor looks for
- project staff
- any consumables beyond typical requirements, or that are required in exceptional quantities
- all resources that have been costed as ‘Exceptions’
- are comprehensive, appropriate, and justified
- represent the optimal use of resources to achieve the intended outcomes
- maximise potential outcomes and impacts
A filled dot only means your answer mentions that ground. It is not a judgement of how well.
Q6 Project partners: letters (or emails) of support
Upload a single PDF containing the letters or emails of support from each partner you named in the project partners section. These should be uploaded in English or Welsh only.
What the assessor looks for
- confirm the partner’s commitment to the project
- clearly explain the value, relevance, and possible benefits of the work to them
- describe any additional value that they bring to the project
- have a page limit of two sides A4 per partner
A filled dot only means your answer mentions that ground. It is not a judgement of how well.
Q7 Host organisation’s support
0 / 500 wordsProvide details of support from your research organisation.
What the assessor looks for
- their position or role
- the department, school or institute they lead
- their contact details
A filled dot only means your answer mentions that ground. It is not a judgement of how well.
Q8 Evaluation plan
0 / 750 wordsHow will the outputs, outcomes and impacts of the project be captured, evaluated and shared?
What the assessor looks for
- a detailed evaluation plan including methodology
- how the evaluation is linked to the STFC Public Engagement Evaluation Framework, as funded applicants will be required to report to this framework
- how learning from the proposed activity will be captured and shared
A filled dot only means your answer mentions that ground. It is not a judgement of how well.
Q9 Dissemination plan
0 / 400 wordsWhat the assessor looks for
- planning for dissemination of the resources, outcomes, outputs, and so on, to relevant audiences
- how wider audiences could benefit through activities, such as the sharing of good practice or sharing learning
A filled dot only means your answer mentions that ground. It is not a judgement of how well.
Q10 Target audience
0 / 100 wordsWe expect that projects will focus on audiences based in the UK. Please show the total number estimated number of people who will be reached within each audience group shown below and express this as a percentage (which must total 100%): primary school children secondary school children (up to 16 years old) 16 to 19-year-olds teachers general public families other You are asked to show a breakdown of Wonder and non-Wonder audiences, where applicable. If you are targeting a specific subset of the general public not mentioned above, please use the entry for ‘general public’ and specify here (for
Q11 Linkage to specific STFC-funded science, technology and research
0 / 300 wordsClearly describe how the activities that are proposed in your project link directly to science, technology or research that is funded by STFC as part of its remit.
Q12 Safeguarding and use of data
0 / 650 wordsWhat are the ethical, RRI and safeguarding considerations, implications and issues relating to the proposed work?
What the assessor looks for
- the relevant ethical and RRI considerations, including both the topic area itself and the design and delivery of the project
- how you will manage these considerations throughout the lifecycle of the project
- how you manage any, and all, safeguarding issues
- any legal and ethical considerations of collecting, releasing and storing the data (including consent, confidentiality, anonymisation, security and other ethical considerations and, in particular, strategies to not preclude further reuse of data)
- formal information standards that your proposed work will comply with
- how you will ensure that all data and content from activities that involves vulnerable adults, children and young people is securely and appropriately managed
A filled dot only means your answer mentions that ground. It is not a judgement of how well.
Q13 Wonder initiative
0 / 300 wordsIf appropriate, how will your project engage with the Wonder Initiative audience and what is the anticipated impact?
What the assessor looks for
- clear evidence of demand
- clear evidence of how the audience would be reached and how proposed activities would appeal
- the appropriateness of the activities to the audience
- the potential impact on the audience
A filled dot only means your answer mentions that ground. It is not a judgement of how well.
Q14 STFC programme area
0 / 50 wordsWhat are the STFC-funded remit areas relevant to your project?
What the assessor looks for
- astronomy, solar and planetary science
- particle physics
- particle astrophysics
- nuclear physics
- accelerator science
- computational science
- quantum technologies
- STFC facilities
A filled dot only means your answer mentions that ground. It is not a judgement of how well.